“Confident of Thailand” is the latest words from Yingluck, Mobius & Moodys, but are they right?
The latest words on Thailand, from Yingluck, Mobius and Moodys are basically they all are confident about Thailand. Yingluck, Thailand’s care taker prime minister said yesterday, it is time to build confidence in Thailand. Mobius, strategist at the guru of emerging markets Templeton Funds, yesterday, breaking a normal pattern of few tweet on anything, went into a series of continuous tweets that basically said he is confident in Thailand’s fundamentals, despite politics. Then Moodys, the credit rating agency, with many reservations, gave Thailand’s credit outlook as “Stable”. Coming out days before the above three made a move, was World Bank, Thailand’s Central Bank and Thailand’s long term planner NESDB, also turned very bullish, but with some serious strings attached, saying that bullish sentiment, depends on Thailand getting its political house in order soon.
But are they right?
Right or wrong, the fact is, the battle in Thailand, is about democracy vs dictatorship (the establishment calls it neutral government for a few years). I just want to remind everyone, that while economics is important, the fact is, several credible & professional research have found, that there is a link between democracy and economic development. These research says, democracy, is a key driving factor, for sustainable strong growth.
(Up-Dated) Since those words a few weeks ago, the Thai stock market had a bit of a bull run, and a few days ago, both Fitch and Moodys, affirm their “Stable Outlook” for Thailand. But many such as Thailand’s largest fund manager, said Thailand’s future looks bleak on politics, even with Fascist Suthep protest down-sizing, but Judicial Coup now the problem.
The following is from mark Mobius Blog:
Throughout its history, Thailand has been subject to periods of political instability that have at times given cause for concern among investors. In the past few months, investor sentiment has reflected the political uncertainty, putting Thailand in the news. Violent demonstrations by supporters of Thailand’s traditional Bangkok-based elite have raised concerns regarding the government’s stability under the pro-populist policy Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, which draws its support from the poorer and more rural north and east of the country. Despite the political unrest, we certainly have not lost confidence in Thailand and believe its economy can bounce back, as it has time and again, from such adverse events. The country has actually been given the moniker “Teflon Thailand” for its resilience in the face of such past events and problems.
I can’t say for sure how the political situation in Thailand will ultimately play out, but I do believe there will be some changes, and I also believe the fundamental direction of the Thai economy should be able to remain on a growth track. Regardless of the macroeconomic or political climate, we are bottom-up stockpickers and continue to look for opportunities to invest where we see potential on an individual-company level.
Will Thailand’s Government Topple?
In the past few months, protesters have attempted to topple the Thai government, triggering a slide in the Thai baht and its stock market, which posted negative performance in 2013 and was near flat year-to-date through late February.1 In December, my team and I were in Bangkok and were surprised to find little evidence that business and the busy shopping areas of the city were being interrupted by the political disturbances at that time. The main tourist areas were also largely unaffected. Our visit came just before King Bhumibol Adulyadej’s 86th birthday, so it is likely that the demonstrations were muted in respect for the king, who is held in high regard. Today, there is fear that continuing political demonstrations could begin to impact business, infrastructure projects and particularly the important tourism industry, which accounts for about 9% of the Thai economy.2 We have heard anecdotal evidence that some tourist bookings have been canceled as a result of the unrest.
If the past is any indication, the impact on tourism of the recent protests could prove relatively short-lived. When Ms. Yingluck Shinawatra’s brother Thaksin Shinawatra was ousted in 2006 in a military coup, there was little impact on tourism. And in 2013, Thailand welcomed a record number of visitors. So, if the demonstrations are having an impact, the overall picture doesn’t seem bleak at this time. MasterCard’s Global Destination Cities Index ranked Bangkok the world’s most-visited city in 2013, with nearly 16 million international visitors.3 Of course, if there is a great deal of violence there is no question that the impact will likely be felt this year. Nevertheless, our experience in Thailand through a great deal of political change and turmoil over the years indicates that the bedrock of Thai sensibility and practicality has eventually prevailed, and historically, when the turmoil has ended, it has generally been back to business as usual.
The Thai stock market can be volatile (as all markets can be) but Thailand’s market has proven resilient during past trials and tribulations. While short-term volatility is likely to continue to impact Thailand’s market as news events unfold, we believe Thailand will eventually find a way out of this latest crisis.
Fortunately, elections in early February, strongly opposed by the People’s Democratic Reform Committee (which has led many anti-government protests), didn’t result in heightened violence. However, voting was disrupted in some areas of the country and it may take several more months to complete the process and fill vacant parliamentary seats. Unfortunately, protests were continuing into mid-February, most recently involving rice farmers, distraught over the government’s failure to pay for rice bought under a subsidy scheme, one of Shinawatra’s signature policies. The subsidy program is threatening to destabilize the budget.
Reasons for Optimism
The situation in Thailand certainly is testing the nerves of investors, but we would argue that a number of countervailing factors favor long-term investment prospects there. Political instability has been endemic in Thailand for many years, but it has not prevented an enviable level of economic growth. Between 2000 and 2012, Thailand’s gross domestic product grew an average 4.2% per annum with a per capita gain of 3.3% per annum4 in a period that included a devastating tsunami in 2004 and severe flooding in 2011. Unemployment in Thailand stood at less than 1% at the end of 2012.5
We believe that a number of factors could permit continued high levels of economic growth in the future. Thailand is a major center for outsourcing by Japanese companies, most notably in the production of automobiles. With Japanese Prime Minister Abe’s efforts to revive Japanese growth showing some signs of success, additional activity in Japan could transmit into increased orders in Thailand.
While Thailand’s growth has been strong, it has also been somewhat uneven with incomes in Bangkok and its hinterland markedly higher than elsewhere. Recent government policy has been aimed at raising incomes and increasing development in the country’s north, and we believe that this process could drive substantial gains in consumer demand supplementing the contribution of a strong export sector.
Southeast Asia generally has seen a surge in middle-class buying power. Thailand’s neighbors, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam and most recently Myanmar, have begun increasingly to adopt market-based economic policies and look outward for economic growth. These developments could ease constraints on Thai growth from shortages of labor and natural resources. Moreover, Chinese-inspired moves to upgrade regional rail links could improve economic links both between Thailand and its neighbors and within the country itself. In November 2013, Thailand’s Senate approved a bill allowing the government to borrow US$69.5 million for a seven-year infrastructure spending project in Thailand that could see high-speed rails linking Bangkok with Laos, the manufacturing zone of Eastern Thailand, Malaysia and the city of Chang Mai to the north, as well as upgrading existing rail and port facilities and improving Bangkok’s mass transit system.
The infrastructure proposals could also provide a major boost to ambitious—but so far unfulfilled—plans to develop a major industrial zone and trade terminal based in the southern Myanmarian port of Dawei. Once linked to Thailand and its railways, Dawei could provide an attractive alternative route for international freight currently forced to move through the difficult and congested Strait of Malacca. Financing for the government’s infrastructure plans is in limbo at present following a legal challenge, but both the government and opposition broadly support the measures.
We can’t exclude the possibility that “this time it’s different” in Thailand; that the present bout of political instability could segue into economic weakness and corporate losses. However, in our opinion, the balance of probability is that positive economic drivers could once again override the short-term impact of Thailand’s political turbulence. And, we strongly believe Thailand’s people and economy will rise above the bickering of the country’s politicians.
Read more about Thailand in my previous post, “Thailand, Land of Smiles.”
Dr. Mobius’ comments, opinions and analyses are for informational purposes only and should not be considered individual investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Because market and economic conditions are subject to rapid change, comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of the date of the posting and may change without notice. This material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, market, industry, investment or strategy.
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Foreign securities involve special risks, including currency fluctuations and economic and political uncertainties. Investments in emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with these markets’ smaller size, lesser liquidity and lack of established legal, political, business and social frameworks to support securities markets.